Thursday, September 26, 2019

Reading response Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 36

Reading response - Essay Example other hand, the US Supreme Court did not completely render it legally useless and added a condition that federal agencies need to consider Indian religions before making any policies that will affect the religious beliefs of the Indians. This paved the way for some positive changes with the formation of American Indian Religious Freedom Coalition (AIRFC) in 1988 which made statutory changes to protect the religious rights of the Indians. One amendment happened in National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) which was enacted in 1992. This Act required that Indian religious and cultural sites be included in the list of National Historic Properties and this automatically protected them from consequences of any federal agencies’ policies (â€Å"American Indian Religious Freedom Act†). Firstly, I doubt the authenticity of this article provided the author name the date of publication are not stated. However, I have found this article quite interesting since it reveals the US government’s contribution in preserving the rights and freedom of the Native American tribes. Being minority, they may endure cynicism in the context of their religious beliefs and it is common occurrence that they face hurdles when attempting to enter religious sites or practicing religious ceremonies. To get the full support of the US Supreme Court it is necessary AIRFA’s language is rectified so that the clauses become more watertight. The article talks about the sacred objects, ceremonies and traditional rites of the American Indians which are included in the Act which protects them from any consequences of policies made by federal agencies. This article leads me to question the actual impact of AIRFA considering that it is not allowed to be used as defensive armor by the Amer ican Indians in the court of law. The US Supreme Court’s limited support on the Act is stated in another article by Alvin M. Josephy et al. (1999) which tells about a case where two Native American employees were

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.